Status #76387

WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 "You have owners. They own you. They [...]

Las Vegas, Nevada
via The Full Circle Project

"You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control all the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pockets, and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all the news and information you get to hear. They got ya’ by the balls.

[…] Well we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I’ll tell you what they don’t want. They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.

[…] They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fuckin’ years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers."

― George Carlin *

* George Carlin:…

September 11, 2001. Some shit came down. From a cosmic context, it didn’t mean much, but for humanity, it was a game changer ― at the risk of sounding bromidic. A few thousand folk died in what the U.S. government alleges was a terrorist attack on domestic ground.

Let’s analyze the above pronouncement, and thereby dismiss it. Prior to humans, there was no domestic nor foreign soil. Planet Earth had land accessible to anyone, or anything. Altruistic of this celestial ball, don’t ya’ think?

Along came a sentient species, ravenous for control, and speciously divided up this gratuitous ground. Far before humans existed, and long after, their territorial boundaries ― from an empyrean standpoint ― didn’t mean anything. Thus, the ideology of domestic and foreign was solely implemented so some frightened control freak could retain what he, she or it perceived as domination.

Hence, no attack on domestic soil, as the ideas of domestic and foreign are meaningless.

Let’s move on, shall we?

Approximately 3,000 people perished on the aforementioned date, as a result of this incident. Again, within this paradigm, not a major deal, since thousands die every day. From a cosmic framework ― as there are countless species Universally ― not much of a dent.

Where proceedings do become important are on the microcosmic level. Even more imperative, September 11, 2001, left behind definitive evidence as to who’d been guilty of sabotage against humanity for some time.

Three steel-framed skyscrapers ― two 110 stories, another 47 floors tall ― were obliterated by two planes.

Let’s repeat this sentence, which defines the official government theory ― a hypothesis a significant percentage of Americans is no longer buying. Two planes demolish three buildings.

Two planes. Three buildings. Math that defies known logic, at this point.

According to the U.S. hegemony, these mammoth edifices were felled by office fires, generated by commercial airliners crashing into two of them. The structures in question were steel-framed skyscrapers ― a type of building that hadn’t prior, nor since, collapsed due to conflagration.

The following entry won’t impart extensive details regarding this event ― as such would require an entire book. However, this segment will provide meaty hunks of veracity blasting cannonball holes in the tenuous hypothesis the American government provides us all.

Let’s revisit simple mathematics: two planes, three structures.

That equation alone should cause people to inquire, “What the fuck―?!?”

Since a capacious faction don’t realize there was a third building ― World Trade Center 7 ― that disintegrated on September 11, few query what we’ve been told.

Let’s start with the most obvious problem regarding the official report of 9/11. There are two main suspects implicated in this crime: al-Qaeda and the U.S. government, itself. The latter was tasked ― via the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) ― to determine what transpired on September, 11, 2001. The aforementioned are government organizations.

How often does one find a main suspect to a crime allowed to solve that malfeasance? By this rationale, shouldn’t al-Qaeda be provided the opportunity to investigate this transgression, as well?

We’re left to ponder the fact not only had no other steel-framed skyscraper in history collapsed due to fire, but three such edifices, on a single day, in the same locale, came to this demise.

Since we’ve addressed problems posed by basic math ― in opposition to the official theory ― let’s move on to dilemmas caused by simple physics. Via NIST, the government would have us believe all 267 stories of World Trade Center 1, 2 and 7 toppled due to warping steel, resultant of office fires. It’s well known such blazes can reach nowhere near the temperature required to accomplish this.

Structural steel does not begin to melt until it reaches about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit. NIST does not suggest that any of the steel in WTC 7 [World Trade Center Building 7] came anywhere close to this temperature. Its most extravagant claim is that some of the beams reached 1,250 degrees Fahrenheit. **

** Griffin, David Ray. (2010). The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Official Report About 9/11 is Unscientific and False. Olive Branch Press. ISBN: 9781566567862

Melting and warping steel happen at different temperatures, but office blazes could never have burnt so virulently to collapse a 47 story skyscraper, let alone two buildings, each 110 floors tall.

In addition, what could have caused pools of molten iron, molybdenum and steel found in the World Trade Center rubble? Temperatures necessary for the above to be present could never have been generated by office fires, but would definitely have been a result of explosives. Infernos within the aftermath raged for weeks ― an occurrence impossible due to the low-level heat produced by smoldering office equipment.

NIST itself reported that it found no evidence that any of [the steel in the Twin Towers] had reached temperatures above 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit. NIST also explicitly stated that the fires in the towers could not have melted any steel. ***

*** IBID.

Copious proof of nano-thermite and thermate ― both products of highly-charged explosives ― were found in the ruins of WTC 1, 2 and 7. Office fires could not have produced these incendiary footprints.

We discover that numerous steel-frame skyscrapers throughout history had endured infernos much greater than those witnessed on 9/11, but none fell as a result.

In 1988, a blaze burned in the First Interstate Bank of Los Angeles for three and a half hours, yet the building failed to collapse. An inferno in 1991 engulfed a skyscraper at One Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia for 18 hours, but didn’t bring the structure down. A high-rise pyre continued 17 hours in Caracas, Venezuela, and the massive edifice remained standing.

Contrary to the infernos within these three buildings, fires in World Trade Center 7, as well as WTC 1 and 2, were dying. Blazes in these structures emitted black, opaque smoke, and were thus going out. As anyone who’s built a fire in a fireplace will note, flames burning hottest emit little exhaust, and those dwindling ― thus least hot ― produce copious amounts of dark smoke. This was evidenced by fires in all three buildings that collapsed at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Additionally, according to NIST, these blazes were fueled by office furnishings, which were designed to be flame-retardant. Columns and supporting beams of WTC 1, 2 and 7 were also coated with fire-proofing products.

As anybody can deduce ― via online videos of the World Trade Center collapses ― buildings were brought down in a controlled, symmetrical fashion. Since the official theory asserts these edifices endured disparate fires on various floors, shouldn’t the skyscrapers have come down in a disorderly way? Previous to, and after these occurrences, the only method by which structures near these magnitudes were destroyed was controlled demolition.

For WTC 7 to have fallen in the fashion it did ― precisely into its own footprint ― it would be necessary 82 structural columns demolish at the same rate, at the same time. It’s a physical impossibility a series of office fires could have caused such a scenario.

Then we have the problem of the evidence itself. Before an investigation could commence, the government carted the remaining portions of all three structures to China and India, and melted it down. Isn’t this destruction of evidence, and thereby obstruction of justice?

The Jersey Girls ― a group of widows, due to the events of that day ― generated sufficient notoriety to force the government to launch a halfhearted and weak investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. This being said, the accuracy of NIST’s findings is highly questionable, as its conclusions were based upon computer simulations, as opposed to the evidence, itself. Variables were fabricated by this government agency, until “sufficient” results were obtained. Even so, the National Institute of Standards and Technology was unable to reproduce what ensued on 9/11, and their conclusions defied known laws of physics.

In the end, 118 of 503 firefighters interviewed on site professed to experiencing, hearing or seeing explosives in use during the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7. Such testimony has been labeled inadmissible in the final NIST report.

Eyewitness corroboration via Barry Jennings and Michael Hess ― deputy director of the Emergency Services Department of the New York City Housing Authority; and New York City’s chief lawyer, respectively ― was dismissed by NIST. Both individuals were inside WTC 7 shortly before the building came down, and both maintained experiencing explosions within the edifice.

And what of NIST’s admission Building 7 collapsed for 2.25 seconds at free fall acceleration? This is equivalent to dropping a bowling ball off a roof. Physics a child can understand prove if something obstructs this object, it’s descent speed will decrease. The only way the ball can drop at the rate of gravity would be if nothing impeded it.

This constant remains true for WTC 7. For this structure to have fallen at freefall speed, the edifice below the descending floors would had to have been removed. This feat is unattainable via office fires, but can easily be accomplished through controlled demolition.

Even when not collapsing at free-fall speed, both WTC 7, as well as Buildings 1 and 2, dropped at a velocity so close to that of gravity, such could only have been caused by regulated destruction.

None of the above even addresses the official theory concerning the Pentagon, nor an open field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, which were also targets during September 11, 2001.

The former is obviously one of the most surveilled buildings on the planet. One wouldn’t be surprised to discover closed-circuit television cameras in the toilets of this edifice, and yet five frames of video is all we’re provided to explain what happened here during 9/11? According to the government theory, a jumbo jet crashed into the Pentagon, but these five frames provide no such evidence. We’ve an ambiguous explosion into the building in question, caused by nothing in particular.

All this from one of the most secure facilities on Earth. Should an hegemony wish to dispel contradictory conclusions, why wouldn’t they produce exhaustive footage ― which they obviously possess ― that would end the dilemma once and for all?

How did Flight 93 near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, evaporate ― when no other airliner in history has, upon impact with soft ground?

Again, this segment is solely meant to address ― in broad terms ― World Trade Center 7, a building approximately 50% of Americans, until recently, didn’t even realize collapsed. Hence, details regarding WTC 1, 2, the Pentagon and Shanksville will be saved for a later entry.

Before moving on, though, ask yourself: Do you think a ragtag group of individuals living in caves could have pulled off a mission of this magnitude against the most technologically advanced nation on Earth?

One would either have to be ignorant, or severely retarded, in order to believe what the U.S. government is asserting regarding 9/11.



Griffin, David Ray. (2010). The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Official Report About 9/11 is Unscientific and False. Olive Branch Press. ISBN: 9781566567862


9/11: Blueprint for Truth — The Architecture of Destruction. Dir. Ken Jenkins. Perfs. Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin. DVD, 2008

9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out. Dir. Richard Gage. Perfs. David Ray Griffin, Niels Harrit, Robert E. McCoy, Tom Sullivan. DVD, 2012

9/11: Press for Truth. Dir. Ray Nowosielski. Perfs. Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg, Lorie Van Auken. DVD, 2006

Online Movies:

9/11: Blueprint for Truth — The Architecture of Destruction:…

9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out:…

9/11: Press for Truth:…

— Hugh Mungus
Please login to make a comment

© 2014 - 2019 Collective Evolution
Collective Evolution is powered by Coeō © 2014 - 2019 Coeō (Matthew Dowle) | Designed and developed by Matthew Dowle | Coeō Terms and Conditions / Legal | Sitemap